02-16-2018 07:22 AM
davefollmers
Posts: 13
|
Alternative structure to 48 team world cup
Hi, Whilst I understand the desire to increase the number of teams in the World Cup, I do not think that the proposed format for 48 teams is the best for the reasons I state below. If it was down to me, I would leave it as 32 teams as I think that is perfect, but I understand there are other considerations. Things about the FIFA proposed structure I don't like are: Sixteen teams will only play 2 games each. It seems like a heck of a lot of work and effort to only play 2 games. In each group, to have 2 out of 3 teams go through to the knockout stage is too many. The current balance of 50% of the teams in a group going through is a much better balance. If it is too easy for teams to go through, people will lose interest. |
|
|
Sort by:
First to Last | Last to First
Replies (2)
|
 |
02-20-2018 08:50 AM
davefollmers
Posts: 13
|
Quote: Hi, Whilst I understand the desire to increase the number of teams in the World Cup, I do not think that the proposed format for 48 teams is the best for the reasons I state below. If it was down to me, I would leave it as 32 teams as I think that is perfect, but I understand there are other considerations. Things about the FIFA proposed structure I don't like are: Sixteen teams will only play 2 games each. It seems like a heck of a lot of work and effort to only play 2 games. In each group, to have 2 out of 3 teams go through to the knockout stage is too many. The current balance of 50% of the teams in a group going through is a much better balance. If it is too easy for teams to go through, people will lose interest.
|
#1 |
02-20-2018 08:51 AM
davefollmers
Posts: 13
|
Quote: Hi, Whilst I understand the desire to increase the number of teams in the World Cup, I do not think that the proposed format for 48 teams is the best for the reasons I state below. If it was down to me, I would leave it as 32 teams as I think that is perfect, but I understand there are other considerations. Things about the FIFA proposed structure I don't like are: Sixteen teams will only play 2 games each. It seems like a heck of a lot of work and effort to only play 2 games. In each group, to have 2 out of 3 teams go through to the knockout stage is too many. The current balance of 50% of the teams in a group going through is a much better balance. If it is too easy for teams to go through, people will lose interest.
|
#2 |
|
 |
 |
You must be logged in to Reply to Threads!
» Members, use the login above.
» Create a FREE account to create Threads and Post on Threads.
To Top